Rawitat Pulam's Weblog


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



Ubuntu PPC
10.25.04 (1:17 am)   [edit]
No, not me; I haven't installed it on my powerbook yet, even though I'd been thinking for a while that having a Debian (or Debian-based) GNU/Linux on a partition of my powerbook would be really handy.

ppcnerds.org has an article about Ubuntu 4.10, The Warty Warthog installation, hardware detection, and a few other things, including a few screenshots.

This seems pretty nice and pretty promising consider how young the Ubuntu distribution is (but, well, it's based on Debian anyway).

Maybe I will give it a try sometime in November.
 
49 and *not* counting!
10.25.04 (12:12 am)   [edit]
Finally, Arsenal's unbeaten run came to the end at the 50th match, by the hand of Manchester United, who failed to do it last year. The scoreline was 2-0, and it was at Old Trafford, home of Manchester United.

Great job for Arsenal, you were great to create such a historical unbeaten run.
Great job for Manchester United, you were great to stop it.

Now, the match was over, the race for championship title goes on. Man Utd is still 8 points behind, but that's not out of realm of possibility. We just have to keep the head held high, look up and forward. We still have to play Liverpool, Chelsea, and of course Arsenal again this season. The next time we meet Arsenal in the league will be at Arsenal's home, and they will obviously looking for revenge. There are still many more teams, M'Boro had been one that gave up most troubles in the past few years, also there's Manchester City.. a team who can't effort to be defeated by Man Utd.

The season goes on. Laugh now and you might not be laughing in the end. Put the match behind and keep doing better job, working harder, then you might.

Go United!
 
'Star Wars III' trailer to debut with 'Incredibles'
10.23.04 (1:48 am)   [edit]
According to MacMinute news:

The first teaser trailer for "Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith" will make its theatrical debut with Pixar's "The Incredibles" on Nov. 5. Members of the official Star Wars site, however, can watch the full teaser beginning on Nov. 4 in QuickTime format. This is not the first time that Lucasfilm and Pixar have teamed up. In 2001, the trailer for "Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones" could be seen in theaters prior to the showing of Pixar's Monsters, Inc. Apple CEO Steve Jobs purchased Lucasfilm's computer graphics division for US$10 million and formed Pixar in 1986.

There's not much wonder in corporation between Lucasfilm and Pixar. Afterall, Pixar was once a Lucas company anyway (as also mentioned in the above article quote).

What I wonder is: how much later would it be on Apple's QuickTime movies trailer site :-)

After Lord of the Rings trilogy and The Matrix trilogy, there had been no movies that I really wait to see. I, Robot came close for being that, but not much, maybe another one could be The Phantom of the Opera.

After Episode II: Attack of the Clones (AotC), while not as good or as powerful as the second of the original trilogy, Episode V: The Empire Strike Back (arguably the best of Star Wars so far, IMHO), had set my expectation high. AotC presented a very complex plot twists and a lot of political stuffs, and complicate character developments, which are quite heavy compared to other Star Wars Movies, and I love that.

AotC also made Episode I: The Phantom Menace to have much more sense and reasonable story development.

Anyway, it's the trilogy with continuing story (unlike Indiana Jones)... so, to be fair to them, you have to watch them all at once, see/feel that flow of the story telling, and then judge it.

I watched the DVD release of the original trilogy last night, all at once, and it's as good as ever. I still prefer Han shoots first of the real original though. (Waiting for LotR: RotK special extended edition now.)

So, I'm keeping my fingers crossed for Episide III: Revenge of the Sith! (btw, Episode VI: Return of the Jedi was named Revenge of the Jedi before Lucas changed the name, about 2 weeks before its release).
 
Thai airplane almost hit Tokyo tower!
10.21.04 (4:21 am)   [edit]
Missed this news on the day it happened: Jumbo jet passes within 200 meters over Tokyo Tower, an news article from Japan Today newspaper.

Tuesday, October 19, 2004 at 07:13 JST
TOKYO — An Orient Thai Airways chartered jumbo jet passed within 200 meters of the tip of Tokyo Tower in the early hours of Sept 19, Ministry of Transport officials said Monday.

TBS news reported that the jet, bound for Haneda Airport, veered off course at 12:20 a.m. after the pilot was given clearance by traffic control at Haneda to locate the airport with the naked eye rather than by radio beacon.

The plane was supposed to come in over Tokyo Bay but instead crossed over Tokyo Station and the Nihombashi district, flying at an altitude of 540 meters. Tokyo Tower stands 330 meters tall.

TBS quoted residents in Higashi-Azabu as saying they could hear the roar of the jet for about 10 seconds.

Orient Thai officials admitted the error, saying the pilot had not been familiar with Japanese flight manuals and landing procedures.

Luckily, it didn't hit Tokyo Tower, otherwise there would be a lot of conspiracy theories linking Thailand to terrorism.

Thailand has a minor Muslim district in the South, and currently there are a lot of conflicts and terrorism there. Roads aren't safe, lands aren't safe either. However, our prime minister still manage to cover the public's eyes with cheap and ridiculous words and celebrities.

I do not by anyway mean that Muslim is bad, I have many Muslim friends and they are nice. Bad people are bad regardless of their religion and nationality, so are good people. I just meant that, it's the fact that Thailand's southern provinces are Muslim area, and people might link them (and Thailand eventually) to terrorism had the plane hit Tokyo Tower.

Well, a note to Thai officials of the Orient Airway: It's good that you admit your error. However, can you not put a blame onto the Japanese procedures and flight manuals?
 
Tokage typhoon had left ...
10.21.04 (3:44 am)   [edit]
Note: After I posted this entry, BBC articles was updated with new death toll (62 people in total) and a lot of new details. My apology for not updating this blog's text to keep up with BBC's article. Please read BBC News article for the latest details.

------------------------- ---------------------

Tokage, Japanese word for "Lizard" was the 10th typhoon to make landfall in Japan this year. It left Japan with a lot of damage. To paraphrase from BBC New:

The deadliest typhoon in a decade has raced across Japan, killing at least 48 people and injuring 200 while another 33 are reported missing.

Typhoon Tokage reached speeds of 229 km/h (142 mph) as it battered the south-west, forcing thousands to evacuate amid the threat of mudslides.

At its peak, it stretched across an 800km (500 mile) radius.

Parts of the south, especially in Miyazaki Prefecture, were virtually shut down with public schools closed and transport services suspended.

More than 50,000 households had no electricity while another 110,000 people were forced to evacuate, according to broadcaster NHK.

Almost 1,000 domestic flights were cancelled, affecting some 127,000 passengers.

Very fortunately, by the time it passed Tokyo, Tokage had weakened and had left not many damage before passing out to the sea.

I live in Tsukuba city, north-east of Tokyo, one of the last place visited by (or affected by) Tokage, and even though it was much weakened, I still think that it's quite strong. Strong enough to make me scare. The sound of rain hitting the roof of my apartment (I'm in the topmost floor) is like the sound of a waterfall (no, I'm not talking Niagara, Victoria, or Iguazu .... that's too huge) and the wind was strong enough to make my apartment shake a bit like an eartquake. The amount of rainfall is enough to create some flood in the area (I've never seen any flood here, despite being here for 6 years and have seen many typhoons).

Full BBC news article here
 
OpenStep's 10th anniversary
10.19.04 (10:26 pm)   [edit]
Yesterday, Oct. 19th, OpenStep API celebrated its 10th anniversary. GNUstep is running an article about this here. To paraphrase:

10 the Magic Number

Today, the OpenStep API celebrates its 10th anniversary. What started out as a joint adventure of NeXT and SUN to define an application development standard that would run on all machines, making "write once compile everywhere" a reality, is still unfolding within the vivid and active community of GNUstep, old NeXT and Apple lovers.

The magic 10 appears in GNUstep's current 1.10.x release and in Apple's MacOS X "Cocoa" release. Programmers worldwide can develop their programs on Mac OS, Linux, the BSDs, Solaris, and with a couple of hurdles -- even on Windows. This solid and well-defined standard is reaching out to the world of software development, slowly but surely.

Program your applications in days or weeks, rather than years or never. Use the advanced API of a development framework that hasn't needed significant modification for 10 years, because it rocks, is stable and just works.

You want to know more? Visit the links below:


Wow.. it had been that long already! Congratulation!

I've never programmed in OpenStep in its glorious days, but I've been learning and coding with Cocoa ever since I moved to the Mac. Great framework, great developer tools. GNUstep is very good, too.

I'm planning to write a few articles about GNUstep on Win32, and portability (source level) between GNUstep and Mac OS X. However, that's when I have time and can come out of my laziness ;-)

And they will be in Thai. We already have a lot of excellence articles about those in English already.
 
Microsoft and music downloads
10.19.04 (10:15 pm)   [edit]
An excellent article from The Register: Microsoft moves in on music downloads.

Very interesting read. If you will read just one article per week about MS vs. Apple's digital media war, then this is this week's article for you. Make sure you read it. A great read for me.
 
Removing Spyware for $39 (?!?!?)
10.18.04 (9:09 pm)   [edit]
From The Financial Express's article: Alarming trend in spyware could undermine IT industry

Spyware’s explosive growth has become a “very alarming trend” that could scare away computer users and undermine the industry, Michael George, general manager of Dell Inc.’s US consumer business, said last Friday.

Spyware, code that allows outsiders to monitor computer activity, now affects about 90 percent of computers, he said.

“It’s not just an annoyance,” George said. “Increasingly, it’s becoming more and more pernicious. It can degrade a system’s performance to the point of being unusable, it can block access to the Internet, it can prevent you from accessing e-mail (and) it can redirect your browser to some other home page.”

With spyware spreading so rapidly, nearly four users in ten say they feel less secure operating their computers today than a year ago, according to a nationwide poll that Dell and the nonprofit Internet Education Foundation (IEF) released Friday.

[stripped, fast forward]

In July, Dell began offering tech-support services for customers willing to pay $39 per incident for diagnostic help in fighting spyware. George declined to say how many people have paid the fee, but said “demand has outstripped capacity.”

Addressing spyware attacks is both expensive and time consuming because each caller could have as many as 200 spyware programs downloaded onto his computer, he said.


What? $39 per incident?!?!?!

If I had been charging the half amount of money whenever I help people remove spyware from his/her computers, I would be able to effort a new PowerBook (whenever it comes out, dual-core hopefully) .. or a shiny new iMac G5 without any trouble!

But wait a minute .... what does that mean?
You get a cheap Wintel computer from Dell, for, say $699, and then with less than 20 incidents you will be able to effort a new iMac running OS X.

However, price you pay for in term of user experience penalty doesn't included in the price tag of the machine in the store, showroom, or website. To large group of user, this is an invisible price that they have never considered. Most users, however, feel it somewhat afterward. Especially when they have something to compared their experience with.

To windows users:
If you like to get Wintel boxes, then remove Windows and install GNU/Linux as soon as you possibly can. I couldn't think of a better way to avoid malware for you at this moment. Beside, Linux is much easier to use and install nowadays. Try the LiveCD if you aren't sure. Many Linux distributions have LiveCD now.

If you stuck in Windows because of your work (with Office or Adobe, or whatever), then get Firefox as your web browser and don't use Outlook or Outlook express for e-mailing (There is Thunderbird, another Mozilla product. I have never used this myself, so I can't recommend and not recommend it).

Otherwise, I would say: get a Mac.

PS: By the way, the article mentioned that spyware are now affects 90% of computers ... familiar with this number? Hmmm, I guess it has something to do with Windows' marketshare/installed bases ;-)

PS2: MacDailyNews's take on this:

$39 per incident? Folks, just 33 incidents (achievable in about 9 seconds on a Windows box) equals the cost of a new Apple iMac G5 running Mac OS X. Name for us anything else in history where people clung to the obviously inferior product and paid extra for the privilege of doing so?
 
1984 and 2004
10.15.04 (7:35 pm)   [edit]
There are a lot of articles about whether the history will repeat itself or not. Apple was there, Microsoft was there, and it was MS who won the previous war in 198x, and drove Apple into a very niche market and became a very minority. Todays, a new war emerge, and it's about digital life and digital right. The players are, among many, Apple vs. Microsft again.

The two articles I found interesting and pretty insightful are:

In my personal belief, it is still very hard to tell who will win this war, but it is even a larger and more important war than the previous one, because this involves a more integratation to everyday life, and our right in digital world. I would not like the customer-lose-all DRM schemes many content providers are trying to apply. So it's pretty important.

I hope it's not the case of Alien vs. Predator: whoever wins, we lose.
 
Gates on IE holes
10.15.04 (2:42 am)   [edit]
From the USA Today's interview with Bill Gates

Q: Speaking of security, Internet Explorer has had well-publicized holes …
Gates: Understand those are cases where you are downloading third-party software.

Q: Yes, but will people continue to do that with Media Center?
Gates: You might well do it. We need to use approaches that block people from ever getting software onto the machine they don't want.

Q: Might you add anti-virus/spyware protection in Windows?
Gates: It's not a thing you build in. You have to offer a service. There are third parties who are doing a good job. We're always taking a hard look, but we don't have any concrete plans.

Q: There is talk of a Google browser. Internet Explorer has had its security woes. How do you keep users?
Gates: More has been invested in making IE secure than any browser on the planet by a long shot. Nothing is going to change. That's the one over 90% of people are going to keep using.

Oh.. my god...

IE makes it super easy to malware creators to install anything onto users' systems without users' permission. So, basically it could be possible that users don't know anything about it at all.

And not adding anti-virus/spyware protection in Windows but hang onto 3rd parties to provide that?

Well, in short:
Solution: not using IE. period.
3rd Parties that should help securing Windows: Mozilla Firefox.

Luckily, I am a switcher to the Mac.
 
Microsoft and customer choice
10.13.04 (7:43 pm)   [edit]
Microsoft Corp. had officially launched the MSN Music Service (the link here is still beta).

Microsoft's comment on its new MSN music service:

"iTunes has done a great job of helping to elevate the [digital music] market," said Christine Andrews, lead product manager of MSN. "We're different because Apple is a closed system. If you want Apple, you have to use the iPod. A lot of people want choice and we offer that."

What does closed system mean?

I think Christine Andrews was referring to the decision by Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs not to license the company's Fairplay Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology to competitors, thereby forcing consumers to buy downloaded music only from its online music store.

Anyway, I don't really think MS technology is more open or close than Apple's. It's the kind of another side of the fence psychological issue.

Anyhow, back to our topic: choice

With the recently iPod market share report, 92.1% of the hard-drive based players, up from last year's 82.2%, and that accounts for 65% of all portable digital music players (including the small storage space, cheap, flash-based ones). HP's Apple iPod is doing well. Also, the iTunes Music Store (iTMS) is still doing pretty well, holding 70% of legally downloaded music market.... it seems that a large amount of customers had made their choice.

I can't summarize this thing about customer choice better than Apple itself did:

"In its response, Apple said its products remain the favorite among consumers. 'Ninety-two percent of customers buying hard-drive based music players are choosing iPods, and over 65 percent of customers buying any type of portable digital music player including flash-based players are choosing iPods,' Apple said in a written statement. 'This means that the iTunes music store, with its catalog of over 1 million songs, works with 65 percent of all MP3 players and 92 percent of all hard-drive based music players being sold today. There is a lot of customer choice happening today, it's just that Microsoft doesn't like the choices customers are making,'"

It's Apple official statement, and I don't know who wrote it. Anyway, I bet that it's Steve Jobs himself ;-)

The last statement is simply beautiful. Just beautiful.

Footnote: (joking intended)
There're a lot of Yet-Another-iPod-Killer (or wannabe) coming out almost weekly recently, either entirely new line of product, or updates of existing ones. However, it seems to me that those iPod-killers are actually killer each other, but not the iPod. So, the more appropriate and precise definition for those players should be: Yet-Another-iPod-Killer's -Killer :-)
 
Debian installation guide
10.13.04 (6:58 pm)   [edit]
Bio-informatics.nl by Rudi van Bavel posted a short and nice tutorial/guide on installing Debian GNU/Linux (dual boot with Windows).

I had similar experience in my latest Debian installation, and was thinking about writing my own. However, this guideline is very nice and easy to follow even for people not familiar with Debian (I guess). It also has a how-to for upgrading kernel and configuring nVidia graphics card, and lastly, installing Bioinformatics packages.

At the end, you will have a working Debian with latest kernel, dual-bootable with Windows.

My only reservation with this guideline is: I don't know about the latest Debian nightly build, but the latest one I have still couldn't detect my display resolution correctly. However, Ubuntu (a distro based on Debian) did. So I don't know if the latest Debian will have problem with this or not. If it still can't detect it properly, you have to edit the X11 configuration file yourself, and it wasn't mentioned in the article.

I sincerely hope that he didn't mention it because Debian does it correctly now, though.
 
School switches from Mac to PC for pricing and maintenance reasons
10.12.04 (6:09 pm)   [edit]
The Cranbury Press runs this article. According to the article, the main reasons are pricing, Macs are too expensive, and maintenance, as well as other unspecified reasons. Quoted below by The Mac Observer's article:

"When we go to create new machines every year, there are tools out there that we can use to burn an image onto a server then onto 15 to 20 laptops at a time," he said about the PC computers. "In the Mac world, they don't have anything like that, they have to be reloaded individually every year."

Macintosh computers are also much more expensive to maintain, Mr. Kaufman said.

"It's cheaper. There's a more competitive edge with a PC base and I can get more laptops with less money," he said.

The school district plans on converting one elementary school each year, Mr. Kaufman said. The Macintosh laptops from Woodland school are not going to waste. "We're cycling the left over laptops to the other schools," Mr. Kaufman said.

Yet-another clueless and ignorance IT manager/administrator's shot at the Mac platform.

True, I agree that for the initial price, Macs are more expensive than PCs (for desktop system, for laptop I think they are quite similar, when you compared Mac laptops to similar spec, from more-or-less the same level makers). However, the initial price alone doesn't do the justice for "pricing". How about price that come with maintenance headache? Price that can't be said in term of money, price you pay as time spend in checking viruses, removing spyware, solving several registration conflicts, and the need to reinstall Windows every once in a while?

Also, WTF with the statement concerning software installation, burning image onto server then onto machines later? This statement alone makes the clueless-ness and ignorance of this IT administrator very obvious. Mac platform has mass administration software, too. For example, Apple's own Apple Remote Desktop is one of them, and it is a very good one, too.

To summarize up my thought on this: for the want of a nail, the kingdom was lost. (Butterfly effect; Chaos theory, see more here).

For the price (money) Mr. Kaufman's trying to save, the school will pay the greater price that can't be put in term of money: maintenance and administrative pain, user experiences, security and vulnerability, and more. As The Mac Observer beautifully put:

Obviously, for the Monroe school system, the choice to change from Macs to PCs is theirs to make, but we feel that the change will ultimately turn out to be a tough lesson for them in the real world of PC computing. We wish them the best of luck.

Good luck, switchers. I won't call you a traitor. I have no right to do, and I have no good reason to do so. I hate zealotary.

You have your own reason, you own freedom to choose. The choice is yours to make, by any reason that is yours to have.

However, any consequence is yours, too. Good or bad, it's yours to face and admit, and have responsibility for your own action.

Good luck.
 
Croquet Developer release
10.12.04 (5:00 pm)   [edit]
The Croquet Project released the initial developer release, called Jasmine, and works on Mac, Windows, and Linux platforms.

Croquet is a combination of a computer software and network architecture that supports deep collaboration and resource sharing among large numbers of users within the context of a large-scale distributed information system. Along with its ability to deliver compelling 3D visualization and simulations, the Croquet system's components are designed with a focus on enabling massively multi-user peer-to-peer collaboration and communication.

The dekstop GUI originally developed by Alan Kay, this and the philosophy above alone make this whole project sounds very interesting to me.

For more information, check out the introduction, screenshots and FAQs

Maybe this is Project Looking Glass done right kind of things. But don't take my comment on this, I haven't tried any of them so I can't make comparison based on what I read and saw on the website alone.

I just downloaded the Mac version and will play with it shortly. Will report back later.
 
Gates preps to pitch 'XP Reloaded' (Reloathed?)
10.11.04 (11:01 pm)   [edit]
From Seattle Post-Intelligencer:

Nearly three years have passed since Microsoft Corp. released the last full version of Windows, the Redmond company's most important and profitable product. But when Bill Gates takes the stage tomorrow morning at the Shrine Auditorium in Los Angeles, he won't be launching a new generation of the flagship operating system.

He'll be looking to stir up some new interest in the existing one.

Microsoft is expected to use the event to unveil a series of new and overhauled digital media products, including a revamped version of its specialized software for watching and recording television and other digital media on a computer.

Hmmm.... so, now we're back to the basic issues regarding MS and digital life we're hearing daily. XP-SP2, more security holes, bad (for customers) DRMs, etc. Not gonna go into any of that, have had them for too much already; you can find discussions/articles about them everywhere online, and in a lot of magazines, though.

Now it's time for some jokes:
Joke #1: Hey, even Gates himself thinks reloading XP will solve the problems!
Joke #2: Or, actually it's "XP-Reloathed"?
 
Java 1.5 vs C#
10.11.04 (8:11 pm)   [edit]
A slashdot article with the same name.

Language flame war again. At least /. people are making a much more informative and insightful war than language zealot wars (mostly VB or .NET vs Delphi) in developer section and computer science section of pantip.com, one of the most famous and most visited Thai web forum, which are mostly and usually childish bashing, who-ever-touch-my-beloved -language-is-stupid-and-b ad, non-informative, pointless and reasonless manner.

Of course, there are many pointless and reasonless (just plain trolling and childish bashing) posts in /., too. But it's still ways less than what I've experienced in the aforementioned forums.

Read /. discussion with open mind, sometime you can learn a lot of things (and sometime, they can be very misleading too).
 
Ubuntu Linux
10.11.04 (6:17 pm)   [edit]
I tried Ubuntu Linux live CD yesterday. Ubuntu is the Debian-based Linux distribution, funded (sponsored) by Canonical Ltd.. It has a nice philosophy and a nice and very active community.

I gave Ubuntu a shot because first thing first, I am a Debian user and I like Debian. I always want to see For-End (and Average)-User Desktop Linux distribution based on Debian myself, and that's what Ubuntu wants to be.

Ubuntu is a complete desktop Linux operating system, freely available with both community and professional support. The Ubuntu community is built on the ideas enshrined in the Ubuntu Manifesto: that software should be available free of charge, that software tools should be usable by people in their local language and despite any disabilities, and that people should have the freedom to customize and alter their software in whatever way they see fit.

Quoted from Ubuntu official website.

Secondly, I like the meaning of the word Ubuntu, which, according to the official website, is an ancient African word, meaning "a person is a person through other people". It describes humanity as "being-with-others". Sharing, consensus, togetherness, are what Ubuntu Linux emphasizes and is a very nice description for Free Sosftware and Open source. More about this on Ubuntu website: Meaning of Ubuntu.

Now it's time for a little review.

I had no problem booting the CD and everything works finely. It detected my Dell Inspiron 4150 display resolution (1400x1050) *correctly*. I couldn't believe it. No Linux distro I've ever tried (well, that's not many though) had ever done this before. Now I'm impressed!

The desktop environment of Ubuntu is GNOME. IMHO, GNOME is quite a nice desktop environment for average end user. I surely believe my girlfriend and my sisters will be able to use it without much trouble, compared to my favourite Window Maker. There are two big players in desktop environment, GNOME and KDE, and I personally prefer GNOME to KDE anyday. So, this is fine with me.

I tried a few apps that included with the LiveCD. Most of them work finely and, surprise, fast.

So, I decided to install it *for real* on a small empty partition reserved for playing with new things (no, I won't trash out my newly installed Debian :-)

I downloaded the preview release of Ubuntu Warty Warthog (4.10) about a week ago, before my installation of Debian. By the way, if you are confused by the version numbering of Ubuntu, which is very unique compared to any other software, see this FAQ entry on Ubunto versioning numbers. In short, the Ubuntu versioning scheme has some similarity to Microsoft's yearly numbering scheme employed in some projects, such as MS Office.

It was the smoothest installation of Debian-based distro I've ever experienced. Actually, one of the smoothest of *all* Linux distros I've installed (including Fedora).

I apt-get-ed installed wmaker and gnustep packages (GORM) right away. However, there are some problems there - it didn't put GORM into any menu! (for Debian, it would be in "Debian menu"). Also, I couldn't easily configure it to use wmaker instead of GNOME.

Still haven't played with it much. But overall, I'm impressed. It seems to be quite a good way to go for Debian-based Desktop Linux.

By the way, you can see some screenshots here (osdir.com).
 
Apple's decision - The Biggest Blunder (?)
10.11.04 (5:49 pm)   [edit]
Source:Fast Company

What is the biggest business blunder in the past half-century? That's easy: Steve Jobs's decision not to license the Macintosh operating system, which cost Apple $559 billion (going by peak market values). Apple had, and probably still has, a better OS than Microsoft's. Instead of leading a $23 billion also-ran, Jobs could have been Bill Gates, with a company worth $582 billion. But Jobs failed to foresee the Mac OS's decline and to take appropriate action: Give in to the inevitable and license the thing.


You can't really blame him. Those who invent something are always the last to part with it. Fortunately for Microsoft, Gates did not invent the original DOS operating system, but bought it. What is bought is easily sold (or, in the case of Windows, leased). It's up to the knowledge chief to cast a cold eye on the future, gather unbiased intelligence on emerging threats and opportunities, and make the tough recommendations to buy, hold, or sell.

No, I'm not buying this. I whole-heartly disagree. MacDailyNews (where I actually read the above quoted article from) took on this issue with a reply based on historical fact here (quoted below):

Actually, the best time for Apple to license the Mac OS (mid - late '80's) came at a time when Steve Jobs was not even with the company. Bill Gates' famous memo imploring Apple to license the Mac OS was sent on July 29, 1985 to Apple CEO John Scully and head of technology for Apple, Jean Louis Gasse, not Steve Jobs. Jobs had been stripped of all duties at the company in May, 1985 and was about to resign in September to begin NeXT. Jobs probably never even saw the memo. So, while Apple's refusal not to license the Mac OS was perhaps the biggest business blunder of the past half-century, it was Sculley's and Gassee's blunder, not Steve Jobs'. We think forcing Jobs out in the first place may have been an even bigger blunder.

Also, count me as minority, call me crazy -- But as a Mac user, I like Apple (Mac OS X actually) to remain minority!

I know, partly business is about money, is about profit. But that's not all what are counted. There are also things like customer satisfaction and loyalty; which Apple excels in. Who knows, had Apple licensed its OS (be it X or pre-X) it might become more like Windows nowadays; viruses, problems, crackers, security, driver conflicts, etc, etc, and etc. One of the magic that make the Mac (and OS X) just works is Apple has the control over almost everything hardware that Mac the Mac. (I know; Apple manufactured none, invented none. I am not talking about that here. What I'm talking about is: Apple makes its own machines, and OS that would work with those machines seamlessly. Unlike Dell and the rest, who pray for MS OS to works).

There are many simple reasons for me to think like this. Fortunately, I don't have to go over them all right here; The Mac Observer has this old article (Feb 20th, 2004): Is Being Part of 5% Really So Bad?, which discussed this in details.


 
A complex system (holism) view of Mac OS X
10.08.04 (10:38 pm)   [edit]
What made Mac OS X special?

When looking at each aspect and each component of OS X, they are simple, nothing special.. yet why OS X provides great user experience as a whole system?

Being a switcher myself, from both Windows and GNU/Linux world (I'm still using them both, more Linux than Windows though), I had been thinking about these questions for a while; ever since I made a switch and settled myself into OS X world (I bought a PowerBook last October, and started feeling at home with it about a week or two afterward).

Being someone who fonds of the idea holism and complex systems (of collaborative individuals) theory, here's is how I attempt to answer those questions:

"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts"

is one thing that made the holism, as oppose to the reductionism, pretty interesting and fit well into my view of OS X. That is if we see the entire OS as a complex system of individual features/programs/aspects , then we have:

There is no one-big-thing that make OS X special, but rather the every-little-thing.

Take some examples from Complex systems (theory) where the emergent, which resulted from collective works of each individual component of the system, is an ubiquitous property, we can clearly see it here:

OS X experience is an emergence of every-little-experience of all aspects of the system. And clearly it is greater than the sum of those aspects together.

As oppose to many other desktop environments, which seem to be trying to provide good and complete user experience for each single application/aspect, but nothing works together seamlessly. No nice interplay between applications, for example. (Being able to copy&paste between apps doesn't count!). This often result in complicate, error-prone, non-consisting with others. Designing small things that only do a few obvious things very well and make them work together as a collection of individual is ways more flexible and simple.

And this is something Apple is really good at doing; think the iPod, which does only a few things compared to most portable music players out there, but it does them well, and work very well with iTunes, which provide yet again the great user experience as the emergence result of their collaborative working.

If you still can't get the idea what I'm talking about, please see one famous example of this idea here:

Boids (Flocks, Herds, and Schools: a Distributed Behavioral Model by Craig Reynolds.


It's a JAVA applet that illustrates Boids algorithm which featuring individual agent (fish, bird, whatever they seem like to you) moving together in swarm. Designing this simulation of bird flocking/fish schooling as one complete system, with a supernatural controller controlling everything (all birds, all fishes, all aspects, all their properties, speed, direction, group behavior, everything) can be very difficult and very complex. As oppose, Boids only use simple algorithm on each agent, to adjust its velocity and direction to match the nearby agents, and this result in a realistic, complicated-looking group behavior, despite the simplicity of the underlying ideas.

Implementing a Boids program will only take me an afternoon (2-dimensional version), while making the system that control all birds/fishes will take weeks or months just to formulate the idea, and longer to make it works. (If you don't believe me, ask the biologists .. they had been studying the group behavior of bird flocking for ages .. yet no model resulted from those studies had even came close to the Boids in providing the realistic flocking behavior).

Read Reynolds' description for more details, and see the applet in action too!

Also, MIT Press has a book called The Computational Beauty of Nature: Computer Explorations of Fractals, Chaos, Complex Systems, and Adaptation by Gary William Flake. This is a great introductory book for this subject, written in computer science spirit (as contrary to many other books on this subject, which were written in spirit of physics). The book has its website here. There are a lot of JAVA applets illustrating many interesting systems as well, along with quotes and glossary from the book.
 
Paste as plain text in Cocoa program
10.07.04 (7:58 pm)   [edit]
Mac Geekery posted this useful hack that allows users to paste things as plain text. This can be pretty useful in many situations. For instant, pasting text from websites with white text and dark background into iChatAV conversation that you set it to opposite color scheme.

This hacks require the Developer Tools to be installed. The Developer Tools came for free with every copy of Panther, and you can download the latest version/patch and latest document updates from Apple Developer Connection (ADC).

This hack also shows how flexible and customizable Cocoa (OpenStep) is. By separating the interfaces and code implementations, and no hard-wiring with codes (like Java) when making connection between user events (what you do with the program) and methods (what is called inside the program when you do something), hacks like this are easily possible.

This is one of many reasons I like about OS X. While providing a kick ass desktop environment, it is really hackable (here I use the old term: hack means 'have fun with/have fun doing' .. not the recent 'breaking the security/program' that all media are using), although not as hackable as GNU/Linux, but it's still fun nonetheless.
 
Some Joke [Ballmer again]
10.06.04 (9:19 pm)   [edit]
Found an interesting article, entitled Some Joke, at Daring Fireball.

The article has a lot of recent quotes from MS CEO Steve Ballmer with good comments. Worth a read.
 
An enemy of yesterday is a friend of today
10.06.04 (9:04 pm)   [edit]
From The Register

Whatever pleasantries once existed between Sun Microsystems and Red Hat have vanished. This won't come as a shock to many of you. The companies have been jawing in the press for some time. The extent, however, of Sun's loathing for Red Hat is more profound than many imagine, with Sun's CEO Scott McNealy largely confirming a shared attack with Microsoft against the Linux vendor.


In essence, McNealy is making another FUD: MS needs Sun to beat IBM and Red Hat.

Let's talk about the article itself first, as it has some interesting points which I agree:
- Red Hat is business (and hence money) oriented company.
- Red Hat isn't cheap anymore.
- Sun had contributed a lot of Open Source, too.

I've never really exclusively used Solaris (only touching it a few times, once in a while), so I can't comment the Solaris issue.

Why the name Red Hat being mentioned a lot here? Well, a lot of Linux zealots today still trying to defend Red Hat when anyone try to associate RH's name with business and money. I agree, though, that without RH, Linux might not be as popular and widespread as it is today. (I never like RH Linux, though. I'd always been a Debian user).

Now, back to the headline: it seems to me that Sun can switch side any day.

Nevertheless, it also seems pointless to me that McNealy is creating FUD after FUD, and saying different things week after week. As my friend Peter told me, Sun seems to have a very good way of obfuscating their strategies... it's so good that most people can't tell whether they have any strategy at all...

The next version of Java Desktop System (JDS) might be then based on Solaris. This will make the name JDS a lot more sense (but still misleading) because Sun can make the transition to the underlying OS without changing the name of the product, and will make the transition much more seamless to users; much like the way Apple did with OS9-OS X.

Hold on.... MS is having problems with Longhorn anyway, and since Solaris is an OS that suppose to be very advanced and very stable ... maybe MS could use Sun's help here ;-)
 
It's the iPod!
10.06.04 (4:25 pm)   [edit]
From MacMinute News

Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster said the based on a survey of 600 teenagers, Apple's iPod is dominating "mindshare and market share." Munster said in a research note that of all the high school students surveyed, 16 percent currently own an iPod and 24 percent plan to buy an iPod within the next year. Munster also noted that the iPod ranked fourth on the teens' holiday wish list--behind clothes, money, and a car--even though the iPod was not an answer option and had to be written in as a response.


Not a surprise. iPod is no longer yet-another-portable-musi c-player. It's an iPod!

People are influenced a lot by media nowadays, and almost everyone around them are talking about this iPod. Especially the non-tech people.

So, "iPod" had became a word itself, much like "walkman" was; when people talk about a portable cassette player, they say "walkman".

Earlier this year, when Apple store at Ginza, Tokyo debutting the iPod-mini in Japan, it was sold out within the first day, with more than 1,500 people waiting in line hours before the openning time (I was there, too, just wanted to see the waiting line).

iPod also became much of a fashion, not just the word for an music player. To many people, when you talk about "iPod" and any other portable music players, they are different; one is a fashion icon, others being plan electronic device, regardless of how many cool features they might have. (Note: I'm not talking tech-knowing people or computer geeks here).

So, those kids wrote the word "iPod" into the poll was, therefore, not a surprise, at all.
 
Ballmer again
10.05.04 (7:17 pm)   [edit]
So he is at it again! Yes, I mean Steve Ballmer, the CEO of Microsoft.

Recently, he said that the most common music format for iPod is 'stolen'. Personally, while I do consider the statement to be true, Ballmer had chose to single out a device while there are a lot other that play unprotected music as well, but he mentioned nothing. Also, not being to playback WMA doesn't mean iPod doens't play music with DRM at all, it just doesn't play Microsoft's ;-)

Today, in another news, he is quoted saying this: "I don't know what I said exactly, but it was bad.", refering to his statement about the iPod.

He also said that Apple is the wrong bandwagon for the digital media/digital life.

I won't put many comment on those topics here, as there are a lot already that floating around everywhere on the internet. However, I do not consider anything Ballmer said that serious anyway. It's just a yet-another-cry he has been making recently. Why?

Well, ... Longhorn is years behind schedule, with features after features being stripped off. Windows XP SP2 seems to be creating more problems than solving, and doesn't seem to be very stable and give good user experience (don't take my words here that serious either, I haven't used it myself, just read them from a lot of forums and news site). IE lags behind all other modern browsers I could think of. Linux becoming much easier to use and really becoming a big threat for MS. .... and a lot of other things I'm not gonna put here.

So, Ballmer is crying FUD here. I don't know what's the plan or what's on his mind. Maybe he hopes to mislead the media (who will, in turn, influence people), promoting FUD directly to customers, or just having fun saying those things out...

For me, I'll be looking for his name every morning, instead of reading those newspaper' 3-columns cartoons.
 
Debian installation and kernel upgrade
10.05.04 (12:24 am)   [edit]
After a year of using Mac OS X exclusively (it is a great OS) and almost touched nothing else, I feel like seeing how things changed in that one year period.

So, it's time to reinstall things on my old Dell Inspiron 4150 (P4m-2.0GHz, 512MB RAM), which I rarely use currently and just sitting here in my room doing nothing for quite a long time. It has Windows XP SP1 and Debian GNU/Linux.

After reading a lot of blogs and webboard, I concluded that I won't waste my time and effort with Windows XP SP2, which seems to create more problems than get them solved. Also, I start getting fed up of XP somehow (especially its activation scheme), so I trashed it out completely and installed Windows 2000, which I think is still the most solid OS MS ever released.

Next, is Debian GNU/Linux.

I always had problems installing Linux on my laptops. It's not that I'm clueless or inexperience, since I had installed it (various distro) on a lot of desktop computers, and almost never have problems with them.

However, things were so different last night.

I tried Debian pre-rc2 (technology preview release) netinst (net-installer), and it seems to have problems with my display during installation, it didn't even display the text-installer properly! (boot: linux vga=771 didn't help either). So I decided to give the nightly build a try, and if it's not working still, I will install another distro.

I downloaded the latest nightly build possible (10/4). To my surprise, the installation went flawless. Let me repeat *flawless*. The new installer works really well, and almost all I had to do, was to hit return after selecting some obvious options.

The only problem I still had: the installer still wasn't allow me to specify the resolution of my display during installation, so I had to edit the /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file by hand.

Next thing was to upgrade the kernel.

Upgrading kernel is pretty easy these days, compared to the last time I did it (that was ages ago, from kernel 2.0 to 2.2), all I needed to do is type this into the terminal


# apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686


It fetched the kernel image, set it up, reconfigured the bootloader (mine is GRUB). All I had to do, was rebooted the machine and enjoy the new kernel!

There is an article by Baurjan Ismagulov about upgrading the kernel this way. It is a short and nice article.
 
Test......
10.04.04 (11:48 pm)   [edit]
Nothing in this entry, just a simple test.

Also want to see if the RSS's working